We live in a broken political system.
Sure, there is room to discuss to what degree the system is broken,
but it is still broken nonetheless. One of the contributing factors
to this is that many people don’t know this simple truth. Many
people don’t think about politics on a day to day basis. They don’t
think about how the government operates and what they do, and some
even go to great lengths to protect the broken aspects of our
political system. In many ways, it is like the movie the Matrix.
Many people live in essentially total ignorance of the political
system we are a part of, just batteries to machine overlords. Some
people even go a step further to defend their position as batteries.
The Electoral College is
a good example of broken relic still present in our political system.
The Electoral College of course could be the subject of many blog
posts, nethertheless it serves as a good example. Does it make sense
that an individual's vote in Wyoming is worth 3.6 (source)
times
more than the vote of someone in California? No. All votes should be
counted equal, this is a fundamental principle of democracy. Now
there are potentially many criticisms to what I just said. Some
assert the electoral college was an important addition by the
founding fathers as a protection against the (unrestrained) will of
the people. Not to ad hominem here, but the founding fathers also
allowed slavery to exist, which clearly conflicts with the ideals of
democracy. I think the argument that the founding fathers wanted this
nation to be a republic governed by white landowners is a poor excuse
to keep such an archaic voting system in place.
Some people seem to enjoy fighting on
the wrong side of the field, and I can understand that. After all,
this blog fights against a lot of current establishment. Some people
took it upon themselves to argue along side of the ISP in the battle
of net neutrality.
And, sure, the argument that the free market should rein can be a
good one, but not when it would give ISP monopolistic power over what
truly is a utility, which for me, is nearly on par with electricity.
(After all, if I had no internet, what would I even do with my
electricity?) The influence that large corporations have in politics
is truly frightening at times. Surely we will talk about Citizens
United, but not in this post.
A
final point to look at is global warming.
The climate is changing, that is a fact. There may be some legitimate
discussion about how much of this change is manmade, and how much is
nature (Google Milankovitch Cycles), but ultimately, there are two
sides of the debate. Science on one side, warning humanity of the
path it is on, and big oil on the other, which makes money today buy
killing tomorrow. Sure, big oil tycoons may destroy the Earth, but
that will be the problem from another generation to deal with. What
confuses me most is the ordinary people that side with big oil. I
mean, sure, it may be tempting to be a shill if I were to be paid,
but some people seem to be willing to do it for free. It simply
amazes me.
Electoral Colleges: they're there so that the popular vote doesn't matter. keep them because the populace can inadvertently vote in a possible dictator. maybe we can learn from the ancient greeks and romans.
ReplyDeleteFree Market: i agree that there should be some regulations and not totally free
Global Warming: the earth will survive with or without humans on the planet. shoot, there wasn't anything living on earth to begin with and it really doesn't need critters nor plants to keep circling around the sun.
btw, the title matrix brings up whether or not we live in base reality. in a multiverse, this doesn't matter because everything is ran in parallel. billions of possibilities, but if we live in an universe, there's a huge possibility that this is a computer simulation where our GOD might just be a being who is really just playing the SIMS and we're all part of their game.
ReplyDeleteMaybe we could learn from the ancient Romans?
ReplyDeletePlease tell me hes kidding..
Remember when the senators stabbed Julius Caesar to death, and then failed to reunite the Roman Empire, therefore directly causing the downfall of Rome?
You use the word "dictator", but sometimes an all-powerful authority is better than a whole room full of inexperienced, half-witted, do-nothings..